Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!newshost.marcam.com!news.mathworks.com!panix!not-for-mail From: jprad@panix.com (jack radigan) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd Subject: Re: Linux vs. BSD?! Date: 21 Feb 1995 22:53:15 -0500 Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and Unix, NYC Lines: 11 Message-ID: <3iecfb$l5b@panix.com> References: <3i7ar8$ahv@marton.hsr.no> <3i83js$avl@ivory.lm.com> <3i9aa3$sbp@fido.asd.sgi.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: panix.com In <3i9aa3$sbp@fido.asd.sgi.com> lm@slovax.engr.sgi.com (Larry McVoy) writes: > certainly are not. Even the original BSD crowd, now at BSDI, > are not shipping all their source. As an owner of a BSD/386 source license there's *very* little missing, mostly drivers that are supplied as proprietary. Certainly no worse than the 4.4 "lite" distribution. -jack-