Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Path: sserve!manuel!munnari.oz.au!mips!mips!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!menudo.uh.edu!sugar!taronga!peter
From: peter@taronga.com (Peter da Silva)
Subject: Re: time for comp.unix.bsd.386
Message-ID: <HTPIMQI@taronga.com>
Organization: Taronga Park BBS
References: <1992Aug24.074542.29794@resonex.com> <I2NI1F7@taronga.com> <1992Aug27.093740.29039@uniwa.uwa.edu.au>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 13:03:59 GMT
Lines: 24
In article <1992Aug27.093740.29039@uniwa.uwa.edu.au> craig@ec.uwa.oz.au (Craig Richmond - division) writes:
>peter@taronga.com (Peter da Silva) writes:
>>FWIW, if we're going to have a bunch of comp.os.unix-alike groups, then
>>this should be comp.os.386bsd. I think it would be better to put the
>>unix-alikes together in a common hierarchy, but for political reasons
>>we shouldn't single out 386bsd as a special case.
>comp.os.UNIX.386bsd
>*craig screams loudly*
Oh, we're at the screaming horror from the sewers of hell stage already,
and the RFD hasn't even started?
I was thinking more of comp.posix.*.
Or, to cut down on the buzz-phrases, comp.os.portable.*.
Can't say open, because DEC will claim that VMS is an open system now...
--
`-_-'
Have you hugged your wolf today? 'U`
Peter da Silva, Taronga Park BBS, Houston, TX +1 713 568 0480/1032