Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!manuel!munnari.oz.au!mips!mips!darwin.sura.net!haven.umd.edu!uunet!stanford.edu!rutgers!cmcl2!prism.poly.edu!kapela From: kapela@prism.poly.edu (Theodore S. Kapela) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd Subject: Re: time for comp.unix.bsd.386 Message-ID: <1992Aug27.122244.23194@prism.poly.edu> Date: 27 Aug 92 12:22:44 GMT References: <1992Aug24.074542.29794@resonex.com> <I2NI1F7@taronga.com> <1992Aug27.093740.29039@uniwa.uwa.edu.au> Organization: Polytechnic University, New York Lines: 32 In article <1992Aug27.093740.29039@uniwa.uwa.edu.au> craig@ec.uwa.oz.au (Craig Richmond - division) writes: >peter@taronga.com (Peter da Silva) writes: > >>FWIW, if we're going to have a bunch of comp.os.unix-alike groups, then >>this should be comp.os.386bsd. I think it would be better to put the > >comp.os.UNIX.386bsd > >*craig screams loudly* > Read the INSTALL.NOTES with the 386bsd 0.1 distribution. It reads: On the INTERNET/USENET, we are hoping to establish our own newsgroup called "comp.os.386bsd". This newsgroup would reside alongside the "comp.os.mach" and "comp.os.linux" newsgroups. Already there are over 100,000 copies of Release and further down: by asking your news coordinator to subscribe to it. We do not recommend using comp.unix.bsd, since 386BSD, like linux and mach, is not a "comp.unix" system. I agree with Peter. "comp.os.386bsd" -- ............................................................................... Theodore S. Kapela kapela@poly.edu Center for Applied Large-Scale Computing Polytechnic University