Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.misc:5102 comp.os.linux.misc:34161 Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.os.linux.misc Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!news.uh.edu!bonkers.taronga.com!peter From: peter@bonkers.taronga.com (Peter da Silva) Subject: Re: Linux thoroughly insulted by Infoworld! Organization: Taronga Park BBS Message-ID: <D34719.908@bonkers.taronga.com> References: <D2yquq.E29@bonkers.taronga.com> <1995Jan26.212545.3335@rosevax.rosemount.com> <D31JDq.JrA@bonkers.taronga.com> <1995Jan27.032144.8740@cs.cornell.edu> Date: Sat, 28 Jan 1995 12:07:56 GMT Lines: 15 In article <1995Jan27.032144.8740@cs.cornell.edu>, Matt Welsh <mdw@cs.cornell.edu> wrote: >In article <D31JDq.JrA@bonkers.taronga.com> peter@bonkers.taronga.com (Peter da Silva) writes: >>In article <1995Jan26.212545.3335@rosevax.rosemount.com>, >>Grant Edwards <grante@reddwarf.rosemount.com> wrote: >>>Was TNIX a v7 clone? As best as I could remember, that was my guess. >>TNIX was vanilla V7 UNIX on the PDP-11. It felt like an early 2BSD source tape. >Long, thin, oxidated, and very very dusty? I don't get it. Phphphphphpht... No frills V7 but you got vi and csh. (thank the gods, the Tektronix editor LDE sucked dirty sweat socks through a mouldy straw)