*BSD News Article 41600


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.misc:5082 comp.os.linux.misc:34058 comp.os.os2.advocacy:76104
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msunews!uwm.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.rain.org!usenet
From: pwalsh@rain.org (Peter Walsh)
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.os2.advocacy
Subject: Re: Linux thoroughly insulted by Infoworld!
Date: 26 Jan 1995 17:47:35 GMT
Organization: Walsh Computing
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <3g8n7n$jrv@news.rain.org>
References: <950116203411@lambada> <1995Jan18.214037.6088@cs.cornell.edu> <3fk4hi$iu8@solaris.cc.vt.edu> <D2pK11.EJx@madge1.demon.co.uk> <3fpk32$80i@unix.sri.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: port34.rain.org

In article <3fpk32$80i@unix.sri.com>, nate@sneezy.sri.com (Nate Williams )
wrote:

> Free software is great, but there is more room for *supported* software in
> the commercial world than for free software.  When my paycheck is depending on
> a pice of hardware/software, I want to *know* that it works, and commercial
> vendors provide me with guaranteed support that NONE of the free software
> folks will give me.
> 

Personaly, I've never had any "support" from a comercial vendor that was
worth a damn. Definitly you should not use linux if you are completely
computer illiterate. Dos either for that matter. The only computer for
those who don't have a clue is the Mac. Even then, it's not a toster.

-- 
Peter Walsh
pwalsh@rain.org