Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.misc:4899 comp.os.linux.misc:33552 comp.os.os2.advocacy:74685 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mira.net.au!news.netspace.net.au!serval.net.wsu.edu!netnews.nwnet.net!oracle.pnl.gov!osi-east2.es.net!lll-winken.llnl.gov!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!hookup!news.mcgill.ca!macs.ee.mcgill.ca!not-for-mail From: ericm@kirk.ee.mcgill.ca (Eric Masson) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.os2.advocacy Subject: Re: Linux thoroughly insulted by Infoworld! Date: 17 Jan 1995 10:44:10 -0500 Organization: McGill University - MACS Laboratory, Montreal, CANADA. Lines: 50 Message-ID: <3fgoka$irk@kirk.ee.mcgill.ca> References: <950116203411@lambada> <3fgihv$ob4@dagny.galt.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: kirk.ee.mcgill.ca In article <3fgihv$ob4@dagny.galt.com>, alex wetmore <alex@pc.cc.cmu.edu> wrote: >I'd agree with this. Like Amiga users there are some Linux users who are >so excited about Linux for some reason that they fail to see anything >else in the world. They tend to say that Linux is the solution to everything >when it really isn't the solution to a lot of things. Amiga users >tend to be exactly the same way. I've used Macs, Apples II's, PETs, VIC20, Amigas, DOS, Windows, C64s, etc. and you find people like that in all user bases. They are usually guided by the fear of having to learn yet another system after having spent considerable time becoming a semi-expert on their OS of choice. They are interesting to listen to because they know exactly all the pros of their operating systems and the worst cons of others. The truth is that most companies must catch up with the others' technology if they want to survive and thus in the end you can always stick with a single companies product unless it goes bankrupt. But Linux and Amigas users are not King of the Hill in this respect. They are just labelled as heretics because their numbers are seen as insignificant. Their pros are much ore solid than some of the other OSs. If you want widespread arrogance then go and look at DOS users. They were the ones chanting "who needs multitasking?", "who needs color?", etc. when their OS did not provide such features. It is so widespread that most of the PC industry's magazines have become nterily subjective. PC magazine is now a joke. Do you remember that issue where they compared DOS to just about everything else available ? What a joke... the Mac was long in the tooth (when the PC still can't do all it does), the Suns where Pizza Boxes, etc. Even Byte magazine, the once multiplatform magazine, has now become PC oriented to the core. DOS finds its strength in numbers. If more people would have jumped off the PC bandwagon for the more evolved OS then I am convinced that would be using superior products today. DOS in my view is equivalent to the middle ages in Europe: it kept us in the darkness. As for Mac users they also have religious fervor when they defend their OS. I've rarely managed to convince a Mac fan of anything despite seeing them go through repeated crashes of their OS. At least Amiga and Linux users are very likely to have tried other OSes before they start making comparisons. With PC and Mac users they rarely step on the other side to see the difference. Salut, Eric -- ================================================================= Eric Masson - ericm@finnegan.ee.mcgill.ca - FAX: 514 398 4470 =================================================================