Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.unix.sys5.r4:9015 comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit:7975 comp.unix.misc:15414 comp.unix.bsd:15831 comp.sys.powerpc:31206 comp.sys.intel:28146 comp.os.misc:3668 comp.os.linux.misc:32855 comp.os.linux.development:22092 comp.os.386bsd.misc:4682 comp.os.386bsd.development:2982 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msunews!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.crl.com!crl10.crl.com!not-for-mail From: jpatrick@crl.com (J. Heather Patrick) Newsgroups: comp.unix.sys5.r4,comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit,comp.unix.misc,comp.unix.bsd,comp.sys.powerpc,comp.sys.intel,comp.os.misc,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.development,comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.os.386bsd.development Subject: Re: Interested in PowerPC for Linux / FreeBSD / NetBSD? Date: 3 Jan 1995 02:00:54 -0800 Organization: Chaos, Inc Lines: 8 Message-ID: <3eb78m$214@crl10.crl.com> References: <3d7vel$442@galaxy.ucr.edu> <D1oDrt.Ir1@sedlbbs.sedl.com> <3e6ndb$6b2@dagny.galt.com> <3e6qft$7bc@news.zynet.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: crl10.crl.com In article <3e6qft$7bc@news.zynet.com>, Stormy Henderson <Stormy@Mail.Mother.COM> wrote: > >Oh quit it already...NT is NOT designed to be a unix. No? so what's the advertising stuff I hear about NT suppossed to be "a better unix than unix"? :-)