Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!manuel!munnari.oz.au!mips!mips!darwin.sura.net!haven.umd.edu!decuac!pa.dec.com!jrdzzz.jrd.dec.com!tkou02.enet.dec.com!tlaeng.enet.dec.com!engage.pko.dec.com!irenaeus.mlo.dec.com!eje Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd Subject: 386bsd 2nd disk confusion? Message-ID: <1992Aug21.195435.24552@engage.pko.dec.com> From: eje@irenaeus.mlo.dec.com (Eric James Ewanco) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 19:54:35 GMT Reply-To: ewanco@kalvin.enet.dec.com Sender: newsdaemon@engage.pko.dec.com (USENET News Daemon) Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation Lines: 17 Hi. Me again. I read here something about requiring a patched kernel to use a second disk. Lucky for me, in my rebellion of youth, I tried it anyway. It worked perfectly. I even figured out how to use disklabel (write me for details if anyone wants to know). I disklabelled it, newfs-ed, and put it in my /etc/fstab. works great. It should be noted that it is a SCSI drive, but driven by the BIOS. I'm confused -- what's the two-disk patch for? -- /=============================================================================\ | Eric Ewanco - Software Engineer For the rash and outrageous opinions ex-| | Digital Equipment Corp, Maynard MA pressed herein I alone am responsible; | | ewanco@kalvin.enet.dec.com they do not belong to DIGITAL(TM). | \==============================- 2 Th 2:15 -==================================/