Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.unix.aix:48621 comp.unix.bsd:15522 comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit:7689 comp.unix.solaris:28078 comp.unix.unixware:15001 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!munnari.oz.au!news.hawaii.edu!ames!hookup!news.mathworks.com!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!sunic!news.uni-c.dk!pd From: pd@kubism.ku.dk (Peter Dalgaard SFE) Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix,comp.unix.bsd,comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit,comp.unix.solaris,comp.unix.unixware Subject: Re: Unix for PC Date: 1 Dec 1994 22:41:24 GMT Organization: What? Me? Organized? Lines: 22 Distribution: inet Message-ID: <3bljek$ln3@news.uni-c.dk> References: <199411210319.TAA18133@nic.cerf.net> <CHRISB.94Nov30100302@stork.cssc-syd.tansu.com.au> <3bihms$5pf@decaxp.harvard.edu> <palowodaD04HqA.LAJ@netcom.com> <3bkt7c$b77@news.uni-c.dk> <1994Dec1.173254.17071@slate.mines.colorado.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: stat.kubism.ku.dk In <1994Dec1.173254.17071@slate.mines.colorado.edu> mbarkah@slate.mines.colorado.edu (Ade Barkah) writes: >Peter Dalgaard SFE (pd@kubism.ku.dk) wrote: >: ... Slackware has been runnable at a level comparable to SunOS >: 4.1.x for at least the past year. Remaining problems are nowhere >: near comparable to what we are seeing currently with Solaris! >Which problems are you referring to ? We're getting Solaris 2.4 >to evaluate, and haven't heard anything of such magnitude that >would prompt the above remark. Could you elaborate on major >problems with Solaris 2.4 ? Just one: It ain't here.....! Was referring to things like the 101318-64 (ten-thirteen-eighteen-stroke-sixty-four) patch for 2.3, which STILL doesn't quite seem to make things like NFS work properly. -- O_ ---- Peter Dalgaard c/ /' --- Dept. of Biostatistics ( ) \( ) -- University of Copenhagen ~~~~~~~~~~ - (pd@kubism.ku.dk)