*BSD News Article 39060


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.unix.aix:48447 comp.unix.bsd:15469 comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit:7637 comp.unix.solaris:27852 comp.unix.unixware:14833
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msunews!uwm.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!uxa.cso.uiuc.edu!rkb55989
From: rkb55989@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Rafal Boni)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix,comp.unix.bsd,comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit,comp.unix.solaris,comp.unix.unixware
Subject: Re: Unix for PC
Date: 7 Dec 1994 16:21:04 GMT
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Lines: 49
Distribution: inet
Message-ID: <3c4ndg$oq@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu>
References: <199411210319.TAA18133@nic.cerf.net> <CHRISB.94Nov30100302@stork.cssc-syd.tansu.com.au> <3bihms$5pf@decaxp.harvard.edu> <palowodaD04HqA.LAJ@netcom.com> <D05760.C33@news.cern.ch> <pageoneD09Mqx.A3u@netcom.com> <D0CDv6.8v@novell.co.uk> <D0E32G.3x8@news.cern.ch> <D0G3ys.DB6@novell.co.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: uxa.cso.uiuc.edu

msohnius@novell.co.uk (Martin Sohnius) writes:

>Dan Pop (danpop@cernapo.cern.ch) wrote:

[...]

>: Has Novell ever released test versions, labeled as such?

>Yes.  They are called beta releases.

>:						Did they ever
>: receive bug reports for these versions? 

>Yes.

>:						Moreover, did they ever
>: receive bug reports for _production_ versions of UnixWare?

>Yes.  What are you actually trying to say/imply?

>: Anyone ever wondered why people in suits don't want commercial OS's?
>: Here is the answer for you.

>You didn't make any statement related to commercial OSes.  Instead, you
>asked three questions whose rhetoric escapes me.  What is the "answer" you
>are talking about?

	What Dan was trying to get accross, I believe, is that the 1.1.xx where
	xx is some number that was referred to previously, is just that, a 
	*BETA* release.  You were saying how shitty Linux QC was, and Dan gave
	an example of the exact same process in the corporate world...

	If you want a Linux kernel that is stable, etc., don't run the daily
	development version [ie, the *BETA* version], run a blessed and stable
	release version.  If you're hacking on the kernel, you might want that
	beta version, and hence it's out there and available....

	Note: I don't use Linux, I know very little about the specifics of what
	was being discussed, but I did catch the subtle implications you seemed
	to brush away with your broad-conclusion brush....

							--rafal
					A happy NetBSD/i386 user...

/--------------------------------------------------------------------------\
|"Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit   |              Rafal Boni |
| 15% of the earth, which is 100% more than they |         r-boni@uiuc.edu |
| have now..." -Cartoon caption in New Yorker    | My opinions, not UIUC's |
\--------------------------------------------------------------------------/