Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.development:2771 comp.lang.basic.visual:27729 comp.lang.basic.visual.misc:844 comp.databases.sybase:11630 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msunews!uwm.edu!news.alpha.net!news.mathworks.com!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!pipex!uunet!explorer.csc.com!explorer.csc.com!not-for-mail From: mpfeifer@csc.com (Mark Pfeifer) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.development,comp.lang.basic.visual,comp.lang.basic.visual.misc,comp.databases.sybase Subject: Re: Visual Basic vs. PowerBuilder Followup-To: comp.os.386bsd.development,comp.lang.basic.visual,comp.lang.basic.visual.misc,comp.databases.sybase Date: 6 Dec 1994 16:39:35 -0500 Organization: Computer Sciences Corporation Lines: 6 Message-ID: <3c2lmn$669@explorer.csc.com> References: <davebo.18.0010EDAE@mcs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: explorer.csc.com X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] The simply answer is if you want to do database applications, PowerBuilder is going to be a better choice. Visual Basic does not offer any control which is equivalent to PB's DataWindow. This control can save some signifcant coding time. mpfeifer@csc.com