Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!llyene!wlbr!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!caen!usenet.coe.montana.edu!bsd.coe.montana.edu!nate From: nate@bsd.coe.montana.edu (Nate Williams) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.misc Subject: Re: FreeBSD 2.0 - a status report. Date: 1 Nov 1994 16:36:52 GMT Organization: Montana State University, Bozeman Montana Lines: 27 Message-ID: <395qr4$msb@pdq.coe.montana.edu> References: <38j31l$6nf@agate.berkeley.edu> <38puin$gp@masala.cc.uh.edu> <38to0m$k6d@fw.novatel.ca> <3937bd$l19@masala.cc.uh.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: 153.90.192.29 In article <3937bd$l19@masala.cc.uh.edu>, Woody Jin <wjin@moocow.cs.uh.edu> wrote: >Was it FreeBSD core team who said that they are willing to hear suggestsion/ >comments ? Why do you take such things so personally ? > >So, you mean that we should just shut the mouth, and if we like what you >coded we use it, if we don't like it we just get out of here. Right ? >Thank you for letting me know your (FreeBSD core team ?) Herb is a NetBSD developer, FYI and doesn't speak for anything but himself if I judge him correctly. However, go back and re-read your article. Although your intent may not have been to 'flame', the tone of the article made it sound like that the FreeBSD folks didn't care and were spending our time on things that were unimportant. The fact of the matter is that to the FreeBSD folks ibsc2 emulatin is more important than MSDOS FS support. That isn't going to change, although it is hoped that the new msdosfs code should be more stable than the pcfs code in 1.1. Nate -- nate@bsd.coe.montana.edu | FreeBSD dude and all around tech. nate@cs.montana.edu | weenie. work #: (406) 994-4836 | home #: (406) 586-0579 | Available for contract/otherwise work.