*BSD News Article 36996


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.development:2619 comp.os.linux.development:17543 comp.unix.bsd:15096
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.development,comp.os.linux.development,comp.unix.bsd
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msuinfo!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!sgiblab!pacbell.com!amdahl!netcomsv!netcom.com!jmonroy
From: jmonroy@netcom.com (Jesus Monroy Jr)
Subject: Re: We a FAQ: Linux vs. *BSD!!!
Message-ID: <jmonroyCxqGC5.IHB@netcom.com>
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
References: <jmonroyCxLro2.IF6@netcom.com> <JKH.94Oct13042845@freefall.cdrom.com> <JKH.94Oct14221201@freefall.cdrom.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 1994 21:14:28 GMT
Lines: 51

Jordan K. Hubbard (jkh@freefall.cdrom.com) wrote:
: In article <37mflh$f6s@unix1.cc.uop.edu> hughes@napa.eng.uop.edu (Ken Hughes) writes:
:    Normally I would agree, but in this case I doubt that ignoring the
:    questions will stop them from being asked.  New people come into these

: Read what I said more carefully, please.  I didn't propose to stop the
: questions, I simply proposed to stop the answers.  The questions will
: keep coming in, but will "quench" themselves far more quickly if
: people simply ignore them.  We're always going to have this question,
: there's no doubt, so the best we can do is try to minimize the amount
: of damage it does.
:
	Jordan,
		please consider the damage that a newbie could
	do, if they answered the question.  That alone should
	convince you of the unsoundness of your idea.  

	Yes, there is a big problem with this idea, but we have
	a bigger problem.  That is, I'm tired of agruing with
	you (and a hunderd) other converts (sp?).  I know for
	a fact I can't get you to do the 386bsd thing with me,
	so why should I bother.   By the same token, I am not
	going to allow you to "bad-mouth" 386bsd.  Given the
	oppertunity (sp?) I will continue.   You know my staying
	power in this issue and we won't have any winners in
	an on going "flame-war".   This is a good solution 
	so that we my go back to work.    Mind you, next week
	I'm interviewing for a job of about $70K.  I won't fight
	you, but I can sure make it so you can't win.... 

		resort to reason... rethink your strategy.

:    386BSD-1.0", so please don't start THAT thread again either).  IMHO, the
:    only chance for resolving this issue would be for someone to sit down and
:    compile a list of features that shows which OS has what and which doesn't.

: I don't agree.  As you seem to concur, the FAQ will be out of date and
: essentially useless far too rapidly to make the effort of writing it
: anything but a wasted one.
:
	If you re-read my original statement, I said each appropriate
	group would maintain their respective portion of the FAQ.
	If you're going to have problems updating a simple FAQ list,
	how in the hell to plan to manage 4 terabytes of data ( the
	virtual space of a Pentium).

-- 
Jesus Monroy Jr                                          jmonroy@netcom.com
Zebra Research
/386BSD/device-drivers /fd /qic /clock /documentation
___________________________________________________________________________