Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.linux.misc:27115 comp.os.386bsd.misc:3735 Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.386bsd.misc Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!pacbell.com!amdahl!netcomsv!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!jeffpk From: jeffpk@netcom.com (Jeff Kesselman) Subject: Re: Nailed down to 386bsd or linux, now which one? Message-ID: <jeffpkCx8M02.60H@netcom.com> Keywords: mosaic term telnet Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest) References: <36nd1u$d80@pdq.coe.montana.edu> <jeffpkCx4wtM.B64@netcom.com> <Cx7Fwx.qLH@ns1.nodak.edu> <36uu78$7e4@kubds1.kub.nl> Date: Thu, 6 Oct 1994 06:00:01 GMT Lines: 22 In article <36uu78$7e4@kubds1.kub.nl>, J.J. Paijmans <paai@kub.nl> wrote: >In article <Cx7Fwx.qLH@ns1.nodak.edu> tinguely@plains.NoDak.edu (Mark Tinguely) writes: >... > >> >>3) there is a slight culture difference between all of the groups. IMO, Linux >> is more DOS friendly, *BSD are more DOS-phobic. NetBSD is multi-platform, > ^^^^^^^^^^^^ > >Ummm. If I see what the "DOS friendly" linux users here have to say about >DOS and MS-Windows, it certainly makes me curious how the DOS-phobic >BSD crowd talk about the Microsoft world... :-) > >Paai > > > > Hey, at least the Linux community are willignto admit tha there is a USE for a DOS emulator.... thats pretty good for UNIX steeped folk...