Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.development:2615 comp.os.linux.development:17475 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!munnari.oz.au!quagga.ru.ac.za!ucthpx!ucthpx!not-for-mail From: vincent@ucthpx.uct.ac.za (R Vincent) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.development,comp.os.linux.development Subject: Re: We a FAQ: Linux vs. *BSD!!! Date: 15 Oct 1994 19:23:53 +0200 Organization: University of Cape Town Lines: 27 Message-ID: <37p379$g17@ucthpx.uct.ac.za> References: <jmonroyCxLro2.IF6@netcom.com> <JKH.94Oct13042845@freefall.cdrom.com> <37mflh$f6s@unix1.cc.uop.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: ucthpx.uct.ac.za X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Ken Hughes (hughes@napa.eng.uop.edu) wrote: : Normally I would agree, but in this case I doubt that ignoring the : questions will stop them from being asked. New people come into these : groups all the time and so these questions are bound to keep coming up. : The problem is, as you point out, not the questions but the answers. It's How about we just randomly assign a person to an operating system? Person 1: "Which is better - FreeBSD, NetBSD or Linux?" Answer 1: "FreeBSD" Person 2: "Which is better - FreeBSD, NetBSD or Linux?" Answer 2: "NetBSD" Person 3: "Which is better - FreeBSD, NetBSD or Linux?" Answer 3: "Linux" The answer will always be correct if it comes from the right person. Of course, only *one* person must answer each question. That way the person stops nagging and the work continues. :-> *slinks back into his hole* -Russell