Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.linux.misc:26943 comp.os.386bsd.misc:3725
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msuinfo!caen!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.world.net!news.teleport.com!news.teleport.com!not-for-mail
From: bmk@teleport.com (bmk)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.386bsd.misc
Subject: Re: Nailed down to 386bsd or linux, now which one?
Date: 13 Oct 1994 22:47:37 -0700
Organization: Department of Redundancy Department
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <37l61p$4qr@elaine.teleport.com>
References: <36qeaf$jt4@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> <37hcr1$8b6@pdq.coe.montana.edu> <37ii2n$2i2@bigboote.wpi.edu> <CxM86z.3D8@bonkers.taronga.com>
Reply-To: bmk@teleport.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: elaine.teleport.com
Keywords: mosaic term telnet
In article <CxM86z.3D8@bonkers.taronga.com>,
Peter da Silva <peter@bonkers.taronga.com> wrote:
>In article <37ii2n$2i2@bigboote.wpi.edu>,
>Linux just has a system-V-ish feel, which isn't a bad thing.
That's certainly a matter of opinion (and probably a hot topic for
debate as well). :)
I switched from Linux to FreeBSD specifically because Linux has
that sleazy sysV-ish feel.
IMHO, of course, and YMMV. :)
P.S. Linux is a fine product. I'm not slamming it; I just happen to
have an irrational dislike of all that is System V. :)
--
bmk@teleport.com | "You need only reflect that one of the best ways to get
Portland, OR | yourself a reputation as a dangerous citizen these days is
| to go about repeating the very phrases which our founding
| fathers used in the struggle for independence."-C.A. Beard