*BSD News Article 36713


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.os.linux.misc:26435 comp.os.386bsd.misc:3658
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.386bsd.misc
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msuinfo!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!sgiblab!sgigate.sgi.com!enews.sgi.com!wdl1!enterprise!pax!brunner
From: brunner@pax.ssd.loral.com (Brian T. Brunner)
Subject: Re: Nailed down to 386bsd or linux, now which one?
Message-ID: <1994Oct7.192523.13197@ssd.loral.com>
Keywords: mosaic term telnet
Sender: brunner@pax (Brian T. Brunner)
Organization: Space Systems/Loral
References: <36djkn$nm8@girtab.usc.edu> <36nd1u$d80@pdq.coe.montana.edu> <371l6s$r63@masala.cc.uh.edu>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 1994 19:25:23 GMT
Lines: 40

In article <371l6s$r63@masala.cc.uh.edu>, wjin@moocow.cs.uh.edu (Woody Jin)
writes:
!!  Xref: enterprise comp.os.linux.misc:26480 comp.os.386bsd.misc:2887
!!  Path:
!! 
enterprise!wdl1!enews.sgi.com!sgigate.sgi.com!sgiblab!cs.uoregon.edu!usenet.ee.p
pdx.edu!fastrac.llnl.gov!lll-winken.llnl.gov!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!howland.reston
n.ans.net!swrinde!news.uh.edu!moocow.cs.uh.edu!wjin
!!  From: wjin@moocow.cs.uh.edu (Woody Jin)
!!  Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.386bsd.misc
!!  Subject: Re: Nailed down to 386bsd or linux, now which one?
!!  Date: 6 Oct 1994 20:03:40 GMT
!!  Organization: University of Houston
!!  Lines: 17
!!  Message-ID: <371l6s$r63@masala.cc.uh.edu>
!!  References: <36djkn$nm8@girtab.usc.edu> <36nd1u$d80@pdq.coe.montana.edu>
!!  NNTP-Posting-Host: moocow.cs.uh.edu
!!  Keywords: mosaic term telnet
!!  
!!  In article <36nd1u$d80@pdq.coe.montana.edu>,
!!  Nate Williams <nate@bsd.coe.montana.edu> wrote:
!!  >In article <36djkn$nm8@girtab.usc.edu>, Po-Han Lin <plin@girtab.usc.edu>
!!  wrote:
!!  >>386bsd is monolithic (controlled I guess), while linux is non-monolithic.
!!  >
!!  >You were misinformed.  Both Linux and the BSD's use monolithic kernels. 
!!  >For a fun discussion of this, there is a series of articles were Linus
!!  >and Andy Tanenbaum 'discussed' the merits of both of these when Linux
!!  >was in it's infancy.
!!  
!!  BTW, I have a question.   Compiling  FreeBSD kernel  in 386 is much faster
!!  than compiling Linux kernel in 486 with twice memory.
!!  I found that Linux compiles everything whatever options I choose.
!!  Am I doing something wrong, or is it the feature of Linux ?
!!  
!!  --
!!  Woody Jin

-- 
.sig under construction, please hold.