Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.linux.misc:26259 comp.os.qnx:1895 comp.os.386bsd.misc:3627 Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.qnx,comp.os.386bsd.misc Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!munnari.oz.au!ihnp4.ucsd.edu!swrinde!news.uh.edu!uuneo.neosoft.com!bonkers.taronga.com!peter From: peter@bonkers.taronga.com (Peter da Silva) Subject: Re: QNX, Linux, or 386BSD? Organization: Taronga Park BBS Message-ID: <Cx1otF.5A1@bonkers.taronga.com> References: <3680r1$dlu@girtab.usc.edu> <jmonroyCx0z90.2DJ@netcom.com> Date: Sun, 2 Oct 1994 12:17:39 GMT Lines: 12 In article <jmonroyCx0z90.2DJ@netcom.com>, Jesus Monroy Jr <jmonroy@netcom.com> wrote: >Po-Han Lin (plin@girtab.usc.edu) wrote: >: If one has a pc compatible with a 486, which OS is the best unix >: operating system? QNX, Linux, or 386BSD? > I must agree with the majority here. > This posting constitutes *flame bait* and does > not ask a real question. (pardon the pun) Jesus, Jesus, pay attention. The majority response isn't "that's flame bait", it's "we need more information."