Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.linux.misc:26097 comp.os.386bsd.misc:3610 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!yeshua.marcam.com!charnel.ecst.csuchico.edu!jwjohn From: jwjohn@ecst.csuchico.edu (Jerry W Johnson) Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.386bsd.misc Subject: Re: Nailed down to 386bsd or linux, now which one? Followup-To: comp.os.linux.misc Date: 4 Oct 1994 07:31:49 GMT Organization: California State University, Chico Lines: 22 Message-ID: <36r0d5$cn6@charnel.ecst.CSUChico.EDU> References: <36djkn$nm8@girtab.usc.edu> <36nd1u$d80@pdq.coe.montana.edu> <36oa4q$4rn@charnel.ecst.csuchico.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: ghoul.ecst.csuchico.edu Keywords: ast, obsolete, micro, monolithic >>For a fun discussion of this, there is a series of articles were Linus >>and Andy Tanenbaum 'discussed' the merits of both of these when Linux >>was in it's infancy. >Might anyone have or know where these articles might be obtained, >please? Maybe a more detailed "when", too? Should anyone else care... The text of this thread is at sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux/Incoming/linux_is_obsolete.txt.z Thanks to those who helped. I'm sure it's old news for the vets, but I found it interesting. Tanenbaum is quite the provocateur! Cheers, --Jerry -- ||=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-||"Thus, the claim about object orientation usually|| ||Jerry W. Johnson ||means only that their latest release was coded in|| ||jwjohn@ecst.csuchico.edu||C++. Big bloody deal." Yourdan,The Decline & Fall|| ||=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-||-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-||