Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.misc Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msuinfo!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!netcomsv!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!jmonroy From: jmonroy@netcom.com (Jesus Monroy Jr) Subject: Re: dual procesor motherboards the way forward? Message-ID: <jmonroyCx2Mv5.GwH@netcom.com> Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest) X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1] References: <Cww6x9.1A0@gnome.co.uk> <36hous$fdv@exile.oec.com> <jmonroyCx10rt.4FF@netcom.com> <36mp62$hk@exile.oec.com> Date: Mon, 3 Oct 1994 00:33:05 GMT Lines: 30 Jim Doyle (doyle@OEC.COM) wrote: : Jesus Monroy Jr (jmonroy@netcom.com) wrote: : : I disagree with both your premises. : : I beleive, first, that the Mach kernel "model" is : : inefficent and is not a good choice for SMP. : : Bill Jolitz agrees to an extent with me. : : He has thrown out the Mach memory manager from : : 386bsd; claiming - it was getting in the way. : : I state that the thread management and thread scheme : : are definitely in the way. : You are high! : Come back and talk when you come down off your trip. : Better yet, go read some of the literature. I'm sure you'll : find that some of the SOSP and USENIX papers on Mach VM : and threads will enlighten you. : I knew this would be good. Let's see if I can enlighten you. Which is dominant in program coding, explict or implict functionality? -- Jesus Monroy Jr jmonroy@netcom.com Zebra Research /386BSD/device-drivers /fd /qic /clock /documentation ___________________________________________________________________________