*BSD News Article 36434


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.os.linux.misc:25919 comp.os.qnx:1878 comp.os.386bsd.misc:3589
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.qnx,comp.os.386bsd.misc
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msuinfo!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!netcomsv!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!jmonroy
From: jmonroy@netcom.com (Jesus Monroy Jr)
Subject: Re: QNX, Linux, or 386BSD?
Message-ID: <jmonroyCx0z90.2DJ@netcom.com>
Followup-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.qnx,comp.os.386bsd.misc
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
References: <3680r1$dlu@girtab.usc.edu>
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 1994 03:05:24 GMT
Lines: 12

Po-Han Lin (plin@girtab.usc.edu) wrote:
: If one has a pc compatible with a 486, which OS is the best unix
: operating system?  QNX, Linux, or 386BSD?  
:
	I must agree with the majority here.
	This posting constitutes *flame bait* and does
	not ask a real question. (pardon the pun)
-- 
Jesus Monroy Jr                                          jmonroy@netcom.com
Zebra Research
/386BSD/device-drivers /fd /qic /clock /documentation
___________________________________________________________________________