Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.linux.misc:25856 comp.os.qnx:1874 comp.os.386bsd.misc:3583 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!netline-fddi.jpl.nasa.gov!nntp-server.caltech.edu!news.claremont.edu!kaiwan.com!not-for-mail From: jclf@kaiwan.com (Jason Fordham) Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.qnx,comp.os.386bsd.misc Subject: Re: QNX, Linux, or 386BSD? Date: 1 Oct 1994 11:39:13 -0700 Organization: KAIWAN Internet (310/527-4279,818/756-0180,714/741-2920) Lines: 8 Message-ID: <36kach$pbe@kaiwan009.kaiwan.com> References: <3680r1$dlu@girtab.usc.edu> <Cwt0rH.E4A@news.cern.ch> NNTP-Posting-Host: kaiwan009.kaiwan.com Keywords: QNX LINUX 386BSD In article <Cwt0rH.E4A@news.cern.ch>, Dan Pop <danpop@cernapo.cern.ch> wrote: >You forgot to tell us what you mean by "the best unix operating system". >Or specify a method of comparing two OS's. So, your question is >meaningless. Ahhh... a Wittgenstien rebuttal, I think...