Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.linux.misc:25395 comp.os.qnx:1840 comp.os.386bsd.misc:3538 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!yeshua.marcam.com!MathWorks.Com!solaris.cc.vt.edu!maddog.async.vt.edu!balister From: balister@maddog.async.vt.edu (Philip Balister) Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.qnx,comp.os.386bsd.misc Subject: Re: QNX, Linux, or 386BSD? Followup-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.qnx,comp.os.386bsd.misc Date: 27 Sep 1994 12:25:20 GMT Organization: Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia Lines: 11 Message-ID: <3692vg$s3b@solaris.cc.vt.edu> References: <3680r1$dlu@girtab.usc.edu> Reply-To: balister@vt.edu NNTP-Posting-Host: maddog.async.vt.edu NNTP-Posting-User: balister X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Po-Han Lin (plin@girtab.usc.edu) wrote: : If one has a pc compatible with a 486, which OS is the best unix : operating system? QNX, Linux, or 386BSD? It depends. Since you haven't listed any requirements and I find linux very good, I say Linux. If you want better advice tell us what you want to use it for. Philip --- Linux: The Choice of a GNU generation!