Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msuinfo!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!EU.net!sun4nl!hacktic!oea.xs4all.nl!ahmed From: ahmed@oea.xs4all.nl (Ahmed Naas) Subject: Re: how man users can FreeBSD (or NetBSD) support? References: <1994Aug29.230845.20621@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> <jmonroyCvDyuC.DL@netcom.com> <342c2r$862@agate.berkeley.edu> <jmonroyCvHo6I.4py@netcom.com> Organization: The Humble Abode Date: Tue, 6 Sep 1994 08:32:40 GMT X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Message-ID: <Cvp92G.8MG@oea.xs4all.nl> Distribution: usa Lines: 24 Jordan K. Hubbard (jkh@violet.berkeley.edu) wrote: : In article <jmonroyCvDyuC.DL@netcom.com>, : Jesus Monroy Jr <jmonroy@netcom.com> wrote: : > Not to start another flame-war but 386bsd (and I understand : > Freebsd does also) has been tested with 200+ users. : > The tests were conducted at UCSF. : > I am speaking of 386bsd release 1.0, of course. : You mean someone has actually logged into the mythical 386bsd 1.0? : I don't suppose you could provide us with the email addresses of : even ONE of these users, could you? Time to give Jesus a hand :-) If you want to talk to somebody who have actually seen 386bsd 1.0 then send e-mail to: Mike Floyd at 76703.4057@compuserve.com Tom Genereaux at 76703.4265@compuserve.com The latest I heard is that they are having production problems with the CDROM. Something about large directory trees. -- The above is a result of random neuron activity in the writer's brain. Ahmed M. Naas ahmed@oea.xs4all.nl ----------------------------------------------------------------------