Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msuinfo!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!emory!metro.atlanta.com!henri.mindspring.com!usenet From: rsanders@mindspring.com (Robert Sanders) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.misc Subject: Re: Linux's primitive C library (was Re: 386BSD Remarkable?) Date: 28 Aug 1994 21:29:35 GMT Organization: MindSpring Enterprises, Inc. Lines: 10 Message-ID: <RSANDERS.94Aug28172938@hrothgar.mindspring.com> References: <FOO-MAN.94Aug23191512@raven.raven.csrv.uidaho.edu> <jmonroyCv2Iw2.AD9@netcom.com> <1994Aug25.074246.4082@cs.brown.edu> <Cv5u8o.CEn@calcite.rhyolite.com> <1994Aug27.175807.20821@cs.brown.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: hrothgar.mindspring.com In-reply-to: mhw@cs.brown.edu's message of Sat, 27 Aug 1994 17:58:07 GMT On Sat, 27 Aug 1994 17:58:07 GMT, mhw@cs.brown.edu (Mark Weaver) said: > and the networking is ALMOST there. My only beef with it is that > the C library is primitive compared to NetBSD. I haven't used or developed under NetBSD, and I actually do very little of my programming in C nowadays, so I have to ask: what's primitive about Linux's C library? -- Robert