Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!manuel!munnari.oz.au!news.hawaii.edu!ames!olivea!uunet!mcsun!uknet!edcastle!aiai!jeff From: jeff@aiai.ed.ac.uk (Jeff Dalton) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd Subject: Re: UNIGRAM's article on the USL-BSDI suit Message-ID: <7078@skye.ed.ac.uk> Date: 6 Aug 92 11:21:15 GMT References: <15o75lINNfi9@agate.berkeley.edu> <25238@dog.ee.lbl.gov> <1992Aug5.231650@eklektix.com> Organization: AIAI, University of Edinburgh, Scotland Lines: 8 In article <1992Aug5.231650@eklektix.com> rcd@raven.eklektix.com (Dick Dunn) writes: > If you find a strong resemblance >between code in SVR4 and code in Net 2, it's probably because the SVR4 code >is derived from BSD work. For a comparison to make sense, you've got to go >back to 32V and compare *that* to Net 2. Unless the people who worked on BSD had access to later versons of AT&T Unix. Then AT&T/USL can use that to muddy the waters.