*BSD News Article 34612


Return to BSD News archive

Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msuinfo!agate!spool.mu.edu!nigel.msen.com!zib-berlin.de!uniol!news.fh-lippe.de!euterpe.owl.de!not-for-mail
From: martin@euterpe.owl.de (Martin Husemann)
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.misc
Subject: Re: Barriers to NetBSD/FreeBSD binary compatibility?
Date: 19 Aug 1994 07:54:43 +0200
Organization: The Other Site - Martin's Museum of Muses
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <331hf3$do@euterpe.owl.de>
References: <32okpu$17u@spool.cs.wisc.edu> <32vok8$kab@fw.novatel.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.owl.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.0 #2 (NOV)

In <32vok8$kab@fw.novatel.ca> hpeyerl@sidney.novatel.ca (Herb Peyerl) writes:

>My choice of OS is obviously NetBSD but it seems I lose because all of
>the available ported packages are done for FreeBSD.  In fact; I still 
>haven't managed to spend the right amount of time to make things like TeX
>work properly under NetBSD. 'LaTeX' dies, 'dvips' dies, and 'xdvik' 
>doesn't work right.

I had all these working some -current's ago, other's have done other things.
So just lets get 1.0 out of the door, sit back a few weeks and watch all the
NetBSD ports pop up on various ftp servers...

Whith a tiny user base as -current you realy can't expect much work being
done on ports, as everyone is busy testing the plain OS.


Martin
-- 
UNIX - An operating system similar to OS-9, but with less functionality
and special features designed to soak up excess memory, disk space and
CPU time on large, expensive computers.
                                            -- OS-9 Glossary