Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.unix.bsd:14618 comp.os.386bsd.development:2405 comp.os.386bsd.bugs:2411 comp.os.386bsd.apps:1353 comp.os.386bsd.questions:12507 comp.os.386bsd.misc:3291 comp.os.os2.programmer.misc:12356 comp.os.linux.development:13620 comp.os.minix:24067 comp.os.mach:4099 comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit:6901
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd,comp.os.386bsd.development,comp.os.386bsd.bugs,comp.os.386bsd.apps,comp.os.386bsd.questions,comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.os.os2.programmer.misc,comp.os.linux.development,comp.os.minix,comp.os.mach,comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!munnari.oz.au!cs.mu.OZ.AU!mrg
From: mrg@mame.mu.OZ.AU (matthew green)
Subject: Re: Report on SVNET: Bill Jolitz's Talk; Mind Overload.
Message-ID: <mrg.777341450@dynamo>
Sender: news@cs.mu.OZ.AU
Organization: Computer Science, University of Melbourne, Australia
X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.0 #4
References: <jmonroyCuq5J1.Fy8@netcom.com> <MIB.94Aug18102735@geech.gnu.ai.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 1994 00:10:50 GMT
Lines: 20
mib@geech.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Michael I Bushnell) writes:
In article <jmonroyCuq5J1.Fy8@netcom.com> jmonroy@netcom.com (Jesus Monroy Jr) writes:
Second: The issue of code reuse....
Bill and Lynn plainly stated that the code is
freely re-distributable and freely re-modifiably,
*AS ALWAYS*.
Fourth: The CD-ROM
The CD-ROM and the annotations may *NOT* be placed
on any FTP'able site for redistribution.
Don't these seem just a little contradictory?
i just thought that they interacted. badly.
.mrg.