Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msuinfo!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!swrinde!news.uh.edu!uuneo.neosoft.com!Starbase.NeoSoft.COM!nobody From: peter@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.misc Subject: Re: SCASI or IDE disk? Date: 13 Aug 1994 20:30:20 -0500 Organization: NeoSoft Internet Services +1 713 684 5969 Lines: 11 Message-ID: <32js3c$djp@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM> References: <salem.136.2E48D0EF@hauk.hsr.no> <michaelv.776576787@ponderous.cc.iastate.edu> <32fnofINN8bn@bonnie.sax.de> <32i46v$50u@quagga.ru.ac.za> NNTP-Posting-Host: starbase.neosoft.com In article <32i46v$50u@quagga.ru.ac.za>, Geoff Rehmet <csgr@cs.ru.ac.za> wrote: >I read somewhere (this was probably written with tongue well in cheek) >that hardened advocates of SCSI prefer to pronounce it as "SEXY" ;-) Apple. They ran some sort of ad campaign to try and get people to call it "SeCSI". Didn't work. Speaking of which, the Mac is 100% SCSI and is still awful popular. Don't expect SCSI to go away any time soon.