Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.unix.bsd:14509 comp.os.386bsd.misc:3043 Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd,comp.os.386bsd.misc Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!paladin.american.edu!constellation!rex!ben From: ben@rex.uokhsc.edu (Benjamin Z. Goldsteen) Subject: Re: Legal status of NetBSD - NeXT Message-ID: <Cu3Axu.Azy@rex.uokhsc.edu> Date: Sat, 6 Aug 1994 01:32:18 GMT Reply-To: benjamin-goldsteen@uokhsc.edu References: <MYCROFT.94Jul24025605@duality.gnu.ai.mit.edu> <310j8t$gl4@csugrad.cs.vt.edu> <310u0n$krt@rhombus.cs.jhu.edu> <3199ok$kq5@carroll1.cc.edu> <31rudm$he4@wombat.cssc-syd.tansu.com.au> Organization: Health Sciences Center, University of Oklahoma Lines: 13 chrisb@cssc-syd.tansu.com.au (Chris Bitmead) writes: >sander@carroll1.cc.edu (Scott B. Anderson) writes: >Out of interest, how did NeXT get out of being sued? Isn't it based on >bsd? Did they not use any disputed code or what? I believe they licensed AT&T (or whatever) a long time ago. Just because they use BSD doesn't mean they didn't pay AT&T... -- Benjamin Z. Goldsteen