Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.unix.bsd:14435 comp.os.386bsd.misc:2909
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!munnari.oz.au!quagga.ru.ac.za!Braae!g89r4222
From: csgr@cs.ru.ac.za (Geoff Rehmet)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd,comp.os.386bsd.misc
Subject: Happy Linux Users (was Re: Legal status of NetBSD)
Date: 30 Jul 1994 09:22:50 GMT
Organization: Rhodes University Computing Services
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <31d65a$8n9@quagga.ru.ac.za>
References: <MYCROFT.94Jul24025605@duality.gnu.ai.mit.edu> <310j8t$gl4@csugrad.cs.vt.edu> <310u0n$krt@rhombus.cs.jhu.edu> <317hcl$s9q@masala.cc.uh.edu>
Reply-To: csgr@cs.ru.ac.za
NNTP-Posting-Host: braae.ru.ac.za
X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.0 #4 (NOV)
In <317hcl$s9q@masala.cc.uh.edu> wjin@moocow.cs.uh.edu (Woody Jin) writes:
>In article <310u0n$krt@rhombus.cs.jhu.edu>,
>Bill Bogstad <bogstad@rhombus.cs.jhu.edu> wrote:
>> ... Good article about FreeBSD/NetBSD/USL law suit ... deleted.
>>Now can we go
>>back to flameing about whether *BSD or Linux are better operating systems?
>>:-)
>> A happy Linux user,
> ^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^
> I thought that those two are oxymoron !!!
>Did I start what you want ? :) :) :)
Errm, excuse me, we have both happy FreeBSD and Linux users here, and
we have FreeBSD and Linux boxes talking to each other every day.
What's more amazing, is that we can manage this without bickering ;-)
Geoff.
--
Geoff Rehmet, Computer Science Department, | ____ _ o /\
Rhodes University, South Africa |___ _-\_<, / /\/\
FreeBSD core team | (*)/'(*) /\/ / \ \
csgr@cs.ru.ac.za, csgr@freefall.cdrom.com, geoff@neptune.ru.ac.za