*BSD News Article 33233


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.misc:2805 comp.os.linux.misc:20231
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!constellation!mimbres.cs.unm.edu!tesuque.cs.sandia.gov!lynx.unm.edu!nntp.sunbelt.net!udel!MathWorks.Com!news.duke.edu!news-feed-1.peachnet.edu!gallifrey!newcombe
From: newcombe@aa.csc.peachnet.edu (Dan Newcombe)
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: I hope this won't ignite a major flame war, but I've got to know!
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 1994 13:46:46 UNDEFINED
Organization: Clayton State College
Lines: 39
Distribution: inet
Message-ID: <newcombe.383.012B356B@aa.csc.peachnet.edu>
References: <30drlt$7tc@news.u.washington.edu> <newcombe.351.00A6A2B3@aa.csc.peachnet.edu> <mrg.774688509@dynamo> <newcombe.379.0044F34E@aa.csc.peachnet.edu> <SJA.94Jul20182426@gamma.hut.fi>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 131.144.82.16
X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev B]

In article <SJA.94Jul20182426@gamma.hut.fi> sja@snakemail.hut.fi (Sakari Jalovaara) writes:
>> Unices with a BSD flavor include: 386BSD, FreeBSD, NetBSD, (BSDi???)
>> Unices with a Linux flavor include: Linux
>There are indeed two free *BSD kernel variants (NetBSD and FreeBSD;
>386BSD is an old version, superseded by the two much improved versions.)
>(There are also different variants of the Linux kernel, e.g. with BSD
>networking code, but we'll just keep ignoring facts as is traditional.)

Or keep distorting the facts as is traditional.  There is one Linux kernel.  
The one that Linus puts out.  Other people may build theirs different 
(patches, etc...)  but the same thing can happen with any OS w/ the source.

There are three BSD kernels:  the one that comes with 386BSD (I don't care if 
it's old, it still exists, the one that comes with NetBSD, and the one that 
comes w/ FreeBSD.   That to me sounds like 3 different OS's.

>UNIX:       AIX, HP-UX, OSF/1, SunOS/Solaris, Linux, BSD, UNI/XT, A/UX,
>            Ultrix, Xenix, Unicos, plus dozens more
>Windows NT: Windows NT
>Since less is better (?) and the mere existence of related operating
>systems detracts from their usefulness (??), we just have proved NT
>the perfect operating system.  Puke.

Hmmm...I never thought of it that way...yuck.   Anyway, I never said that less 
is better, I was just trying to clarify the original statement.

>For different needs.  One if you want a free UNIX.  The other if you
>want a free UNIX.  (Spot the difference and win a trip around the world!)

Really?   Hmmm...I'll have to look into that :)  But, what if I want a free 
UNIX?  :)

	-Dan

--
Dan Newcombe                    newcombe@aa.csc.peachnet.edu
Clayton State College           Morrow, Georgia
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
"And the man in the mirror has sad eyes."       -Marillion