Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msuinfo!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!news.intercon.com!panix!MathWorks.Com!news2.near.net!news.delphi.com!usenet From: John Dyson <dysonj@delphi.com> Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd Subject: Re: 4.4-lite? Date: Sat, 16 Jul 94 20:01:57 -0500 Organization: Delphi (info@delphi.com email, 800-695-4005 voice) Lines: 23 Message-ID: <Bs2yi5F.dysonj@delphi.com> References: <2vgvc7$3tg@spruce.cic.net> <301rrc$cmv@masala.cc.uh.edu> <Csxxqo.DsM@newsserver.aggregate.com> <3097eh$m2h@pdq.coe.montana.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: bos1c.delphi.com X-To: Nate Williams <nate@bsd.coe.montana.edu> Nate Williams <nate@bsd.coe.montana.edu> writes: >Unless the port is to a completely different platfrom. The move to 4.4 >has placed both groups on level ground for the most part, so getting >another BRAND-NEW (PPC, ALPHA, etc..) platform going is going to take >the same amount of work for both folks. And remember -- the FreeBSD VM kernel enhancements are already in our 2.0 working sources. Also, some review is being done to make sure that the enhancements are either optional or machine independent. Most likely, the FreeBSD V2.0 release will have fully coherent buffer cache/VM also. (BTW -- the working copy of the code is now at least as fast as the OLD methodology buffer cache code!!!) The only thing that I know that we are going to leave out from FreeBSD 1.1.5 is the clustering code -- the vfs layer clustering with the FreeBSD VM clustering do well enough. In fact, the FreeBSD VM clustering is being greatly enhanced... So, yes when it comes to porting platforms -- FreeBSD and NetBSD SHOULD be on nearly level playing grounds -- but the FreeBSD kernel, when it comes out will be as advanced as ever. John dyson@implode.root.com