Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!jussieu.fr!univ-lyon1.fr!ensta!itesec!keltia.frmug.fr.net!not-for-mail From: roberto@keltia.frmug.fr.net (Ollivier Robert) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions Subject: Re: What version of gcc on FreeBSD? Date: 11 Jul 1994 21:18:15 +0200 Organization: A Happy FreeBSD 1.1.5 Usenet Site Lines: 25 Message-ID: <2vs5u5$1k0@keltia.frmug.fr.net> References: <2votf5$4p6@keltia.frmug.fr.net> <2vql62$2mb@ohlone.kn.PacBell.COM> Reply-To: roberto@hsc.fr.net (Ollivier Robert) NNTP-Posting-Host: keltia.frmug.fr.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In article <2vql62$2mb@ohlone.kn.PacBell.COM>, Sherman Mui <smui@news.kn.PacBell.COM> wrote: > Oops, never got that src distribution. Oh well... You should, you know. Recompiling your kernel is the best reasons to get it, you can get rid of unused drivers, put new ones, ans so on. > Why isn't it recommended? It's buggy isn't it? Yep. Especially in the C++ part. > Also what AT&T C++ compiler does gcc 2.4 and 2.5.8 use? I'm taking some The C++ compiler used by GNU is not the AT&T one... > C++ programming class, I just wanted to make sure I wouldn't be having > any problems with the compiler. It is more or less equivalent to the 3.0 version cfront I think. I'm not sure though... -- Ollivier ROBERT roberto@hsc.fr.net Hervé Schauer Consultants Ollivier.Robert@keltia.frmug.fr.net PERL / MIME / PGP 2.6ui FreeBSD keltia 1.1.5(RELEASE) RELEASE#0 i386