*BSD News Article 32157


Return to BSD News archive

Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!news.umbc.edu!haven.umd.edu!ames!decwrl!pa.dec.com!usenet.pa.dec.com!jkh
From: jkh@nx.ilo.dec.com (Jordan Hubbard)
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.development
Subject: Re: Socket PCMCIA Ethernet
Date: 23 Jun 1994 10:19:58 GMT
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation, Galway Ireland
Lines: 14
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <JKH.94Jun23111958@nx.ilo.dec.com>
References: <CHANG.94Jun3133133@virtual10.harvard.edu>
	<JKH.94Jun22064125@morse.ilo.dec.com>
	<VIXIE.94Jun22130802@office.home.vix.com>
	<JKH.94Jun23071711@nx.ilo.dec.com>
	<VIXIE.94Jun22235610@office.home.vix.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: nx.ilo.dec.com
In-reply-to: vixie@vix.com's message of 22 Jun 94 23:56:10

In article <VIXIE.94Jun22235610@office.home.vix.com> vixie@vix.com (Paul A Vixie) writes:

>was _not_ an example of the ideal long term solution.  The current code WORKS
>and I'm about to start using it myself and it's going to be like a lifeline to
>a drowning laptop -- I meant no disparagement.

Fair enough.  But now you've piqued my interest - are you referring to
the current code in FreeBSD, or in NetBSD?  If NetBSD has this `PCMCIA
bus' code working now, then I'm quite interested in seeing it.  It
would definately more in line with what I'd like to see, and if no
functionality trade-off need be made to have it at this time, then I'm
REALLY interested.

				Jordan