Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!manuel!munnari.oz.au!news.hawaii.edu!ames!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!rutgers!ub!csn!raven!rcd From: rcd@raven.eklektix.com (Dick Dunn) Newsgroups: alt.suit.att-bsdi,comp.unix.bsd Subject: Re: UNIGRAM's article on the USL-BSDI suit Message-ID: <1992Aug5.230446@eklektix.com> Date: 5 Aug 92 23:04:46 GMT References: <1992Aug3.143259.23897@crd.ge.com> <1992Aug4.212819.19417@lmpsbbs.comm.mot.com> <1992Aug05.150156.1019@NeoSoft.com> Organization: eklektix - Boulder, Colorado Lines: 11 karl@NeoSoft.com (Karl Lehenbauer) writes: >Why can't USL just buy a copy of BSD/386 and compare it themselves? It's even simpler than that. Since USL's claim is that the code subject to their license is in Net 2, they don't have to buy/license anything from BSDI. They can just ftp a copy of Net 2 and have at it. Of course, a "comparison" isn't enough, but that's another matter. -- Dick Dunn rcd@raven.eklektix.com -or- raven!rcd Boulder, Colorado ...I'm not cynical - just experienced.