Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!manuel!munnari.oz.au!mips!mips!swrinde!sdd.hp.com!caen!destroyer!uunet!hela.iti.org!wotan.iti.org!scs From: scs@iti.org (Steve Simmons) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd Subject: Re: Berkeley Strikes Back? Message-ID: <scs.712889713@wotan.iti.org> Date: 4 Aug 92 00:55:13 GMT References: <158frnINN5cn@agate.berkeley.edu> <MIKE.92Jul30085914@majestix.cs.uoregon.edu> <1992Jul30.193017.28689@gateway.novell.com> <1992Aug3.010714.13359@athena.cs.uga.edu> <scs.712849571@hela.iti.org> <jim.712886149@oinker> Sender: usenet@iti.org (Hela USENET News System) Organization: Industrial Technology Institute Lines: 25 Nntp-Posting-Host: wotan.iti.org jim@ferkel.ucsb.edu (Jim Lick) writes: >In <scs.712849571@hela.iti.org> scs@iti.org (Steve Simmons) writes: >>The current AT&T licences contain a similar statement. It was not >>always there. If memory serves, it was the appearance of this >>statement in the licence that caused the Regents to stop getting AT&T >>source. They did not sign a licence with that statement. >That's curious. I read the current brief and they included as an exhibit >a source license for Western Electric, but they didn't include a copy of >the license which Berkeley agreed to. Seems odd, doesn't it? No, it sounds right. UCB/CRSG was signing stock AT&T academic licences. Again, please allow for hazy memory . . . the first few UNIX licences I saw were from Western Electric for UNIX v7 and System III. That clause appeared with the V32 release, and UCB wouldn't sign. Therefore the last licence they signed was probably from WE. Can one of the BSD folks or somebody with a good collection of ";login:" verify this sequence? -- "If life were fair, the acquisition of a large bosom or a massive inheritance would have no bearing on your ability to attract the opposite sex, and Dan Quayle would be making a living asking runny-nosed children, `Do you want fries with that?'" -- John Cleese