Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Path: sserve!manuel!munnari.oz.au!uunet!ferkel.ucsb.edu!oinker!jim
From: jim@ferkel.ucsb.edu (Jim Lick)
Subject: Re: Berkeley Strikes Back?
Message-ID: <jim.712886149@oinker>
Organization: University of California, Santa Barbara
References: <158frnINN5cn@agate.berkeley.edu> <MIKE.92Jul30085914@majestix.cs.uoregon.edu> <1992Jul30.193017.28689@gateway.novell.com> <1992Aug3.010714.13359@athena.cs.uga.edu> <scs.712849571@hela.iti.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 1992 23:55:49 GMT
Lines: 17
In <scs.712849571@hela.iti.org> scs@iti.org (Steve Simmons) writes:
>The current AT&T licences contain a similar statement. It was not
>always there. If memory serves, it was the appearance of this
>statement in the licence that caused the Regents to stop getting AT&T
>source. They did not sign a licence with that statement.
That's curious. I read the current brief and they included as an exhibit
a source license for Western Electric, but they didn't include a copy of
the license which Berkeley agreed to. Seems odd, doesn't it?
Jim Lick
Work: University of California | Play: 1236 Camino Meleno
Santa Barbara | Santa Barbara, CA 93111-1007
Dept. of Mechanical Engr. | (805) 964-2088 voice/msg
2311 Engr II Building | (805) MUD-SPY1 data
(805) 893-4113 | jim@case.sba.ca.us
jim@ferkel.ucsb.edu | jim@cave.sba.ca.us