Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.misc:2370 comp.os.linux.misc:13345 Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.os.linux.misc Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!yeshua.marcam.com!MathWorks.Com!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!emory!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!netcomsv!netcom.com!hasty From: hasty@netcom.com (Amancio Hasty Jr) Subject: Re: Impressions: FreeBSD vs Linux Message-ID: <hastyCouGst.KwG@netcom.com> Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest) References: <2p72cm$278@eve.adam.com.au> <2p6jqn$9b2@acme.gatech.edu> <2pfjmi$3j9@u.cc.utah.edu> Date: Tue, 26 Apr 1994 02:12:29 GMT Lines: 18 In article <2pfjmi$3j9@u.cc.utah.edu> terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert) writes: >In article <2p6jqn$9b2@acme.gatech.edu> gt8134b@prism.gatech.edu (Robert Sanders) writes: >]steve@adam.com.au (Stephen White) writes: >] > >Actually, a better plan is a protected mode vm86() call so anything >anyone wants to write in kernel space could make a BIOS call if it >needed one. Care to elaborate on this one so we may implement it :) Tnks, Amancio -- FREE unix, gcc, tcp/ip, X, open-look, netaudio, tcl/tk, MIME, midi,sound at freebsd.cdrom.com:/pub/FreeBSD Amancio Hasty, Consultant | Home: (415) 495-3046 | e-mail hasty@netcom.com | ftp-site depository of all my work: ahasty@cisco.com | sunvis.rtpnc.epa.gov:/pub/386bsd/X