*BSD News Article 29708


Return to BSD News archive

Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!foxhound.dsto.gov.au!fang.dsto.gov.au!yoyo.aarnet.edu.au!news.adelaide.edu.au!news.cs.su.oz.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!yeshua.marcam.com!MathWorks.Com!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!retix!spock!joshua
From: joshua@sleepy.retix.com (joshua geller)
Subject: Re: The 4.4BSD-Lite distribution announcement
Message-ID: <JOSHUA.94Apr22231703@sleepy.retix.com>
Followup-To: comp.unix.bsd
In-reply-to: grau@theben.mch.sni.de's message of 22 Apr 1994 20:45:20 GMT
Nntp-Posting-Host: sleepy.retix.com
References: <2p4ieg$89j@agate.berkeley.edu> <Cons40.6H2@bull.nl>
	<2p9d10INN63i@theben.mch.sni.de>
Date: 23 Apr 1994 06:17:02 GMT
Lines: 31

In article <2p9d10INN63i@theben.mch.sni.de> grau@theben.mch.sni.de (Guenter 
Grau) writes:

>   Jos Vos (jos@bull.nl) wrote:
>   : bostic@toe.CS.Berkeley.EDU (Keith Bostic) writes:

>   : >     To obtain  4.4BSD-Lite  we  require  execution  of  the
>   : >Berkeley  License  Agreement  (3/94).   In addition, foreign
>   : >licensees must  execute  Addendum  Number  One  for  Foreign
>   : >Licensees  in ordering 4.4BSD-Lite.  The fee is $1000.00 for
>   : >4.4BSD-Lite.

>   : Does this mean that 4.4SD-Lite will not become available on
>   : FTP-sites, or are sites (after paying $1000.00) allowed to
>   : make it available for the Internet community?

>   As far as I understood it, this is true. Perhaps they didn't make it
>   available, because they wanted to earn some money, before everybody
>   can ftp it. The origional announcement stated, that it has the usual
>   BSD copyright notice, which allows you to freely redistribute the
>   stuff. What I do not understand is, why are they making such a heck
>   around the licensing?

the part that confuses me is this: we have an at&t source license. the
chances of me convincing management to spend $2500 on 4.4 encumbered
for me to play with are small to nonexistent. but *if we obtained it
elsewhere* it would be perfectly legit for us to have, yes? the berkeley
portions are publicly redistributable and we have a license for the
at&t/usl/novell/beatrice portions.

josh