*BSD News Article 29470


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.misc:2322 comp.os.linux.misc:12921
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!hookup!yeshua.marcam.com!charnel!xmission!u.cc.utah.edu!cs.weber.edu!terry
From: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert)
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.os.linux.misc,alt.magnus.and.ketil
Subject: Re: Impressions: FreeBSD vs Linux
Date: 11 Apr 1994 21:16:02 GMT
Organization: Weber State University, Ogden, UT
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <2ocemi$kb2@u.cc.utah.edu>
References: <MAGNUS.94Apr4201634@haukugle.ii.uib.no> <2o50rl$h11@u.cc.utah.edu> <MAGNUS.94Apr9155537@haukugle.ii.uib.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.weber.edu

Magnus>Who needs a core team?

Terry> Anyone who wanted a smooth transition instead of a 16 month
Terry> power struggle if the lead developer dropped out.

Magnus>I think people are more likely to drop out of a 'core team' than the
Magnus>Linux movement. With Linux, you only work as much as you feel like.
Magnus>Our 'lead developer' does a lot, true - but that's because he wants
Magnus>too. He doesn't *have* to hand-optimize the patches he recieves.

A core team is a node of stability in the flux of constant source changes;
currently, there are two nodes: NetBSD and FreeBSD.  You are not required
to live at one or the other locations to be able to do something useful.

People pop in and out of the BSD core teams, albiet infrequently.  The
main advantage is in continuity of purpose, something that is not able
to be maintained in a single point of failure.  The most stunning example
of what I believe would happen to the Linux community without Linus is
what already happend to the BSD community without continued interaction
by Bill Jolitz (the Linus of BSD).

I would advise some type of core team approach in the Linux community
as well as a prophylactic against a single point of failure before it
becomes necessary.  You can still grant Linus an overriding veto on
top of the organization, but the organization ought to be in place
*before* there is a need for it.

History does repeat itself.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@cs.weber.edu
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.