Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!yeshua.marcam.com!MathWorks.Com!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.net!xlink.net!subnet.sub.net!nadia.stgt.sub.org!delos.stgt.sub.org!luva!migieger From: migieger@luva.stgt.sub.org (Michael Giegerich) Subject: Re: FreeBSD: iozone results References: <2no7ih$qq5@tut.msstate.edu> <2nog3l$hqh@sylvester.cc.utexas.edu> Organization: private FreeBSD site Date: Wed, 6 Apr 1994 20:29:58 GMT Message-ID: <CnuuAD.13F@luva.stgt.sub.org> Lines: 16 In article <2nog3l$hqh@sylvester.cc.utexas.edu>, Vax <vax@sylvester.cc.utexas.edu> wrote: >My guess: >The writes are faster than the reads because they are being cached >and not physically ''written''. However, the reads must actually access >the disk. Yes. Let iozone go further in auto mode. You will see more liable figures with 8 or maybe 16 MB files. Bye, -Michael -- ------------------------------+------------------------------ Michael Giegerich | migieger@luva.stgt.sub.org ------------------------------+------------------------------