Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!constellation!news.uoknor.edu!ns1.nodak.edu!netnews.nwnet.net!reuter.cse.ogi.edu!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!nigel.msen.com!zib-berlin.de!uniol!news.fh-lippe.de!euterpe.owl.de!not-for-mail From: martin@euterpe.owl.de (Martin Husemann) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions Subject: Re: USL vs. 386BSD derivatives Date: 9 Apr 1994 08:04:59 +0200 Organization: The Other Site - Martin's Museum of Muses Lines: 19 Message-ID: <2o5gib$km@euterpe.owl.de> References: <Joel.2.0011F385@InfoMagic.com> <hastyCnwoL5.F9z@netcom.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.owl.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Keywords: USL, 386BSD X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.0 #1 (NOV) In <hastyCnwoL5.F9z@netcom.com> hasty@netcom.com (Amancio Hasty Jr) writes: >Also, given that bsd4.4-lite is going to be freely available and that >BSDI continues to release bsd, it is pretty much senseless for usl >to stop the net2 distribution already available on the Net. > So the question now is: Will the Net sit back or strike back ? Sit back and laugh at that fools! Hey, they haven't managed to come up with a solid UNIX (tm) yet... Martin -- "Der DOS-Emulator von Linux wird uebrigens immer besser - neuerdings laeuft sogar Zerberus (Mailboxsoftware) damit!" -- Christopher Creutzig in de.comp.security <tkPp9MD4Batz8@38.hot.gun.de>