Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!yeshua.marcam.com!MathWorks.Com!mvb.saic.com!news.cerf.net!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!pa.dec.com!usenet.pa.dec.com!jkh From: jkh@sentnl.ilo.dec.com (Jordan Hubbard) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.development Subject: Re: FreeBSD-current now supports DMA bounce-buffers Date: 29 Mar 1994 15:19:17 GMT Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation, Galway Ireland Lines: 12 Distribution: world Message-ID: <JKH.94Mar29161917@sentnl.ilo.dec.com> References: <JKH.94Mar25155604@sentnl.ilo.dec.com> <1994Mar29.135344.21939@sandia.gov> NNTP-Posting-Host: sentnl.ilo.dec.com In-reply-to: aflundi@sandia.gov's message of Tue, 29 Mar 1994 13:53:44 GMT In article <1994Mar29.135344.21939@sandia.gov> aflundi@sandia.gov (Alan F Lundin) writes: I've seen reference to 32MB come up quite a bit, but I haven't seen discussion of say 48MB or 64MB. Is this just because 32MB motherboards are common, or is there a fundamental limitation of some sort to 32MB? I think this is just financial. There is no reason why 64Mb wouldn't work just as well (drool). Jordan