*BSD News Article 28594


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.apps:1063 comp.os.linux.misc:11203
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.apps,comp.os.linux.misc
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!wupost!csus.edu!netcom.com!hasty
From: hasty@netcom.com (Amancio Hasty Jr)
Subject: Re: DOOM for X
Message-ID: <hastyCn145r.E4t@netcom.com>
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
References: <2mb2bb$8m@u.cc.utah.edu> <2mh1ta$m21@usenet.mcs.kent.edu> <1994Mar21.144650.11760@taylor.wyvern.com>
Distribution: inet
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 1994 19:15:23 GMT
Lines: 24

In article <1994Mar21.144650.11760@taylor.wyvern.com> mark@taylor.wyvern.com (Mark A. Davis) writes:
>borsburn@mcs.kent.edu (Bret Orsburn) writes:
>
>

>>If X terminals aren't cheaper than workstations, the motivation for using
>>them becomes *very* weak.
>
>They ARE cheaper than "workstations", first in the hardware cost, but as
>I just said above, companies typically will spend at least the cost of the
>hardware in maintenance and support services for workstations (or clones)
>each year.  Xterminals have a huge advantage in this area.

Well you can have PC **color** workstations which are cheaper and faster
than most or all X-terminals. For less than $3000 you can have 
a PC workstation with a Sony 17" capable of 1600x1200. As for maintenance
there are PC companies which provide on-site support (cheap).

	Mark, How is you linux system coming along :)
-- 
FREE unix, gcc, tcp/ip, X, open-look, interviews, tcl/tk, MIME, midi, sound
at  freebsd.cdrom.com:/pub/FreeBSD
Amancio Hasty,  Consultant |
Home: (415) 495-3046       |  
e-mail hasty@netcom.com	   |  ftp-site depository of all my work:    
ahasty@cisco.com           |  sunvis.rtpnc.epa.gov:/pub/386bsd/X