Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!newshub.nosc.mil!nosc!pegasus!richard From: richard@pegasus.com (Richard Foulk) Subject: Re: Stable *BSD for Intel Message-ID: <1994Mar15.205532.19577@pegasus.com> Organization: Pegasus, Honolulu References: <2l81of$rmp@pdq.coe.montana.edu> <CMGMoA.F03@apollo.hp.com> <2lqd2a$12e@pdq.coe.montana.edu> Date: Tue, 15 Mar 94 20:55:32 GMT Lines: 13 >>3) NetBSD-current appears to be quite stable, though until very >> recently it still had some lingering bugs in the wd driver which >> could result in data loss. Just curious (not trolling for flames here, really); if xBSD is having trouble with its veablefeltzer driver and yBSD has a functioning one, then do the dev-gods crib from the yBSD implementation or scratch build? How much coordination is there between x and y? -- Richard Foulk richard@pegasus.com