Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!foxhound.dsto.gov.au!fang.dsto.gov.au!yoyo.aarnet.edu.au!news.adelaide.edu.au!gateway.dircsa.org.au!cleese.apana.org.au!cleese.apana.org.au!not-for-mail
From: newton@cleese.apana.org.au (Mark Newton)
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions
Subject: Re: Stable *BSD for Intel
Date: 20 Mar 1994 20:05:17 +0930
Organization: cleese.apana.org.au Public Access UNIX +61-8-3736006
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <2mh8tj$rbt@cleese.apana.org.au>
References: <1994Mar15.205532.19577@pegasus.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cleese.apana.org.au
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8]
In article <1994Mar15.205532.19577@pegasus.com>, Richard Foulk (richard@pegasus.com) wrote:
> >>3) NetBSD-current appears to be quite stable, though until very
> >> recently it still had some lingering bugs in the wd driver which
> >> could result in data loss.
> Just curious (not trolling for flames here, really); if xBSD is having
> trouble with its veablefeltzer driver and yBSD has a functioning one,
> then do the dev-gods crib from the yBSD implementation or scratch build?
> How much coordination is there between x and y?
NONE, OF COURSE!!
Everyone knows that xBSD is better than yBSD! Why the hell would we want
to use their shitty drivers??! In fact, they're too dumb to write their
own drivers, they've stolen all the code from ours! What NERVE!
Ghods, some people just have no idea!
- mark
[ :-) ]
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------
I tried an internal modem, newton@cleese.apana.org.au
but it hurt when I walked. Mark Newton
----- Voice: +61-8-3735575 --------------- Data: +61-8-3736006 -----