Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.linux.misc:10863 comp.unix.bsd:13582 Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.unix.bsd Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!yoyo.aarnet.edu.au!news.adelaide.edu.au!news.cs.su.oz.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msuinfo!agate!library.ucla.edu!csulb.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!hasty From: hasty@netcom.com (Amancio Hasty Jr) Subject: Re: BSD vs. Linux Message-ID: <hastyCMp27r.LG3@netcom.com> Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest) References: <DHOLLAND.94Mar13163925@husc7.harvard.edu> <SJA.94Mar14164332@gamma.hut.fi> Distribution: inet Date: Tue, 15 Mar 1994 07:02:15 GMT Lines: 15 In article <SJA.94Mar14164332@gamma.hut.fi> sja@snakemail.hut.fi (Sakari Jalovaara) writes: >> Yes, it does. The Ultrix kernel (for example) has all sorts of cruft >> in it associated with supporting obsolete terminal hardware and stuff >> like that. Just for example. why argue with this guy? --- The sources are publicly available --- -- FREE unix, gcc, tcp/ip, X, open-look, interviews, tcl/tk, MIME, midi, sound at freebsd.cdrom.com:/pub/FreeBSD Amancio Hasty, Consultant | Home: (415) 495-3046 | e-mail hasty@netcom.com | ftp-site depository of all my work: ahasty@cisco.com | sunvis.rtpnc.epa.gov:/pub/386bsd/X