Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.misc Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!yeshua.marcam.com!MathWorks.Com!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!library.ucla.edu!ihnp4.ucsd.edu!sdd.hp.com!col.hp.com!csn!boulder.parcplace.com!imp From: imp@boulder.parcplace.com (Warner Losh) Subject: Re: Shared Library Status ? Message-ID: <CMF0oG.F4z@boulder.parcplace.com> Sender: news@boulder.parcplace.com Organization: ParcPlace Boulder References: <michaelv.762936864@ponderous.cc.iastate.edu> <hastyCM9r6q.KFB@netcom.com> <2lgb5g$11gc@introl.introl.com> Date: Wed, 9 Mar 1994 20:53:03 GMT Lines: 14 In article <2lgb5g$11gc@introl.introl.com> tim@introl.com (Tim Chase) writes: >This makes me wonder if there wasn't some problem with the earlier >implementations of shared libs didn't have a performance problem that >was fixed. I don't remember any discussion, however, of such a problem >but it's certainly possible. I know that when I was porting OI to FreeBSD that the shared libraries took forever to come up. I haven't done before and after timings, but it seems to be getting a little faster, but not a lot. Warner -- Warner Losh imp@boulder.parcplace.COM ParcPlace Boulder I've almost finished my brute force solution to subtlety.