Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!ihnp4.ucsd.edu!ucsnews!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!agate.berkeley.edu!cgd
From: cgd@erewhon.CS.Berkeley.EDU (Chris G. Demetriou)
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions
Subject: Re: Stable *BSD for Intel
Date: 12 Mar 94 02:52:57
Organization: Kernel Hackers 'r' Us
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <CGD.94Mar12025257@erewhon.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
References: <2l71jpEr19@uni-erlangen.de> <hastyCM5Jqn.513@netcom.com>
<2lcs8t$ffq@fw.novatel.ca> <hastyCM9CHI.Lsy@netcom.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: erewhon.cs.berkeley.edu
In-reply-to: hasty@netcom.com's message of Sun, 6 Mar 1994 19:22:30 GMT
In article <hastyCM9CHI.Lsy@netcom.com> hasty@netcom.com (Amancio Hasty Jr) writes:
>So once again, if one of the netbsd advocates can make available a known
>*stable* snapshot.
When i make the snapshots i put up for FTP, they're basically equivalent
to the binaries that sun-lamp is running at the time.
i put the latest snapshot up the day after i last dumped sun-lamp.
it's been up for 12.5 days (with the last several reboots being
voluntary -- new kernels and such) with those binaries.
i'd call that a "reasonably stable" snapshot.
cgd
--
chris g. demetriou cgd@cs.berkeley.edu
you can eat anything once.